Leslie Hurst
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Demography top 1%
- Elder Abuse and Neglect
Papers in
-
- Web and Library Services 3
-
- Library Science and Administration 4
- Library Science and Information Literacy 4
- Co-authors
- Ralph I. Horwitz (2 shared papers)Mark S. Lachs (2 shared papers)Christine L. Williams (1 shared paper)S. O’Brien (1 shared paper)Leo M. Cooney (2 shared papers)Mary E. Tinetti (2 shared papers)Denise Acampora (2 shared papers)Sharon K. Inouye (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (2 papers)College & Undergraduate Libraries (1 paper)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (1 paper)New Review of Academic Librarianship (1 paper)Journal of General Internal Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Leslie Hurst
12 papers receiving 649 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 143
- Demography 349
- Health 152
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 63
- Clinical Psychology 172
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Hurst
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Hurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Hurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Hurst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Hurst
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Hurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Hurst. The network helps show where Leslie Hurst may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Leslie Hurst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 315 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 223 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 7 | The Properties and Uses of Roman Cement | 2002 | 4 |
| 8 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 0 |
About Leslie Hurst
Leslie Hurst is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (4 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers), Web and Library Services (3 papers), Islamic Studies and History (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (143 citations), Demography (349 citations), Health (152 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (63 citations) and Clinical Psychology (172 citations). Leslie Hurst has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ralph I. Horwitz, Mark S. Lachs, Christine L. Williams, S. O’Brien, Leo M. Cooney, Mary E. Tinetti, Denise Acampora, Sharon K. Inouye, Daymond Wagner and Terry Fulmer. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, College & Undergraduate Libraries, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, New Review of Academic Librarianship and Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.