Leo Chen
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
- Neurology 17
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 17
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 2
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Paul Bernard Fitzgerald (11 shared papers)Kate E. Hoy (8 shared papers)Caroline Gurvich (1 shared paper)Jayashri Kulkarni (3 shared papers)Hannah Dobson (1 shared paper)Charles Benjamin Malpas (1 shared paper)Toby Winton‐Brown (1 shared paper)Aidan J. C. Burrell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Brain stimulation (8 papers)Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)CHEST Journal (2 papers)Depression and Anxiety (2 papers)Blood (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Leo Chen
28 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Neurology 302
- Clinical Psychology 120
- Occupational Therapy 17
- Psychiatry and Mental health 43
- General Health Professions 52
Countries citing papers authored by Leo Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Chen. The network helps show where Leo Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leo Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 2 |
About Leo Chen
Leo Chen is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiation, Infectious Diseases and Health Informatics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (17 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper) and School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (302 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations), Occupational Therapy (17 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (43 citations) and General Health Professions (52 citations). Leo Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Bernard Fitzgerald, Kate E. Hoy, Caroline Gurvich, Jayashri Kulkarni, Hannah Dobson, Charles Benjamin Malpas, Toby Winton‐Brown, Aidan J. C. Burrell, Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib and Zafiris Jeff Daskalakis. Their work appears in journals such as Brain stimulation, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, CHEST Journal, Depression and Anxiety and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.