Lee J. Cronbach
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.02%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.05%
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Papers in
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 9
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment 6
- Education 15
- Co-authors
- Paul E. Meehl (1 shared paper)Goldine C. Gleser (13 shared papers)Lita Furby (1 shared paper)Nageswari Rajaratnam (5 shared papers)Richard J. Shavelson (1 shared paper)Robert J. Sternberg (1 shared paper)Richard E. Snow (3 shared papers)Leslie Hendrickson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychometrika (10 papers)Psychological Bulletin (9 papers)Journal of Educational Psychology (9 papers)American Psychologist (9 papers)Educational and Psychological Measurement (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lee J. Cronbach
112 papers receiving 56.3k citations
Lee J. Cronbach's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
- Applied Psychology 4.0k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7.3k
- General Psychology 717
- Social Psychology 11.1k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 6.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Lee J. Cronbach
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee J. Cronbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee J. Cronbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee J. Cronbach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lee J. Cronbach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee J. Cronbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee J. Cronbach. The network helps show where Lee J. Cronbach may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lee J. Cronbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests Hit paper breakdown → | 1951 | 32330 |
| 2 | Construct validity in psychological tests. Hit paper breakdown → | 1955 | 7620 |
| 3 | Essentials of Psychological Testing Hit paper breakdown → | 1960 | 3382 |
| 4 | How we should measure "change": Or should we? Hit paper breakdown → | 1970 | 1998 |
| 5 | The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Hit paper breakdown → | 1957 | 1637 |
| 6 | The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles Hit paper breakdown → | 1974 | 1511 |
| 7 | Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. Hit paper breakdown → | 1975 | 1415 |
| 8 | My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 1135 |
| 9 | Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity." Hit paper breakdown → | 1955 | 1082 |
| 10 | Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions Hit paper breakdown → | 1978 | 1055 |
| 11 | Assessing similarity between profiles. Hit paper breakdown → | 1953 | 954 |
| 12 | Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Hit paper breakdown → | 1987 | 856 |
| 13 | Handbook of Human Intelligence Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 850 |
| 14 | Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. Hit paper breakdown → | 1983 | 724 |
| 15 | Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding Hit paper breakdown → | 1951 | 614 |
| 16 | Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Hit paper breakdown → | 1968 | 562 |
| 17 | THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY† Hit paper breakdown → | 1963 | 535 |
| 18 | Toward Reform of Program Evaluation Hit paper breakdown → | 1981 | 519 |
| 19 | The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Hit paper breakdown → | 1974 | 491 |
| 20 | Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Hit paper breakdown → | 1966 | 336 |
About Lee J. Cronbach
Lee J. Cronbach is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 118 papers that have together received 64.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (11 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (9 papers), Cognitive and psychological constructs research (7 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (6 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (6 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (4.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7.3k citations), General Psychology (717 citations), Social Psychology (11.1k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (6.8k citations). Lee J. Cronbach has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Meehl, Goldine C. Gleser, Lita Furby, Nageswari Rajaratnam, Richard J. Shavelson, Robert J. Sternberg, Richard E. Snow, Leslie Hendrickson, Douglas B. McLeod and Willard G. Warrington. Their work appears in journals such as Psychometrika, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Educational Psychology, American Psychologist and Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.