Lee E. Patterson
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 19
- Medieval Literature and History 13
- Byzantine Studies and History 7
- Anthropology 10
- Classical Antiquity Studies 6
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 4
- Co-authors
- Catherine Batt (1 shared paper)Kathleen A. Biddick (1 shared paper)David A. Boyd (1 shared paper)Marjan Ghahramanlou‐Holloway (1 shared paper)Su Yeon Lee‐Tauler (1 shared paper)Jessica M. LaCroix (1 shared paper)Paul A. Olson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Speculum (4 papers)Studies in the age of Chaucer (4 papers)South Atlantic Quarterly (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Exemplaria (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lee E. Patterson
26 papers receiving 151 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Classics 372
- History 247
- Literature and Literary Theory 119
- Anthropology 75
- Language and Linguistics 73
Countries citing papers authored by Lee E. Patterson
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee E. Patterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee E. Patterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee E. Patterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lee E. Patterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee E. Patterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee E. Patterson. The network helps show where Lee E. Patterson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Lee E. Patterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 96 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 63 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 61 | |
| 5 | Negotiating the past | 1987 | 26 |
| 6 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 9 | Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury tales : a casebook | 2007 | 18 |
| 10 | 1993 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 14 | Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales | 2006 | 8 |
| 15 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 6 | |
| 20 | Rome's Relationship with Artaxias I of Armenia | 2001 | 5 |
About Lee E. Patterson
Lee E. Patterson is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology, History, Archeology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 38 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (372 citations), History (247 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (119 citations), Anthropology (75 citations) and Language and Linguistics (73 citations). Lee E. Patterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Batt, Kathleen A. Biddick, David A. Boyd, Marjan Ghahramanlou‐Holloway, Su Yeon Lee‐Tauler, Jessica M. LaCroix and Paul A. Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Studies in the age of Chaucer, South Atlantic Quarterly, The Modern Language Review and Exemplaria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.