Laura Werlen

15 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

Laura Werlen
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Clinical Psychology 113
  • Applied Psychology 13
  • Health 13
  • Social Psychology 32
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17
Replace Nikolaus Röthke with:
Nikolaus Röthke Germany
Vita Ligaya Dalgaard Denmark
Sedat Ișıklı Türkiye
Youngha Oh United States
Julie Arsandaux France
Mona Ahmed Germany
Joni McKeeman United States
Fei‐Hong Hu China
Leonie Klaufus Netherlands
Scarlett Smout Australia
Laura Werlen relative to Nikolaus Röthke Germany Nikolaus Röthke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nikolaus Röthke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Werlen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Werlen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Werlen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Werlen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Werlen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Werlen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Werlen. The network helps show where Laura Werlen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura Werlen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura Werlen Line = papers co-authored together Laura Werlen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2021136
2 201926
3 202024
4 202412
5 201710
6 20246
7 20234
8 20232
9 20232
10 20221
11 20241
12 20221
13 20251
14 20221
15 20211
16 20250
17 20250
18 20250
19 20240

About Laura Werlen

Laura Werlen is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (1 paper), Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper), Fatty Acid Research and Health (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (113 citations), Applied Psychology (13 citations), Health (13 citations), Social Psychology (32 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (17 citations). Laura Werlen has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Meichun Mohler‐Kuo, Simon Foster, Susanne Walitza, Milo A. Puhan, Markus A. Landolt, Magnus Helgesson, Ellenor Mittendorfer‐Rutz, D. Vogt, Sibil Tschudin and David Conen. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact