Lance Good

580 citations
15 papers · 408 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Lance Good

15 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Lance Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Human-Computer Interaction 184
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 251
  • Information Systems and Management 37
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 15
  • Geography, Planning and Development 23
Replace David Carr with:
David Carr United States
Sriram Karthik Badam United States
C. Lewis United States
Yann Riche United States
Curtis Wong United States
William C. Janssen United States
Jagoda Walny Canada
Michael G. Lamming United States
E. Harslem United States
Tera Marie Green Canada
Lance Good relative to David Carr United States David Carr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
David Carr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lance Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lance Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lance Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lance Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lance Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lance Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lance Good. The network helps show where Lance Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Lance Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lance Good Line = papers co-authored together Lance Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2000188
2 200388
3 200251
4 200423
5 200214
6
CounterPoint: Creating Jazzy Interactive Presentations
20019
7 20059
8 20039
9 20056
10 20025
11 20042
12 20111
13 20201
14 20021
15 20021

About Lance Good

Lance Good is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (7 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (6 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (5 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (4 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (3 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (184 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (251 citations), Information Systems and Management (37 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (15 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations). Lance Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin B. Bederson, Jon Meyer, Mark Stefik, Patrick Baudisch, Polle T. Zellweger, Jock D. Mackinlay, Eric A. Bier, Kris Popat, William C. Janssen and Ashok C. Popat. Their work appears in journals such as Information Visualization, The FASEB Journal, Lecture notes in computer science, Elsevier eBooks and Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact