L. E. Chow

636 citations
9 papers · 401 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

L. E. Chow

8 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

L. E. Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Condensed Matter Physics 316
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 318
  • Materials Chemistry 104
  • General Materials Science 5
  • Control and Systems Engineering 17
Replace Henrique Neves Bez with:
Henrique Neves Bez Denmark
Jiawei Lai China
T.P. Beales United Kingdom
P Guruswamy India
Joydeb Mandal India
Michiya Okada Japan
D. Toyota Japan
Ke-Jun Xu United States
S. Pavan Kumar Naik Japan
Hongling Xiao China
L. E. Chow relative to Henrique Neves Bez Denmark Henrique Neves Bez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Henrique Neves Bez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. E. Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. E. Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. E. Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. E. Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. E. Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. E. Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. E. Chow. The network helps show where L. E. Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. E. Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. E. Chow Line = papers co-authored together L. E. Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2022163
2 202295
3 202253
4 199234
5 202223
6 202516
7 197014
8 20243
9 20240

About L. E. Chow

L. E. Chow is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Control and Systems Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (5 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (3 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (2 papers), Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics (1 paper), Topological Materials and Phenomena (1 paper) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (316 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (318 citations), Materials Chemistry (104 citations), General Materials Science (5 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (17 citations). L. E. Chow has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ariando Ariando, Shengwei Zeng, Chi Sin Tang, Zhi Shiuh Lim, Changjian Li, Yu Cao, Ping Yang, Xinmao Yin, Zhaoting Zhang and Junxiong Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Advanced Materials Interfaces, Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact