Kyoko Ueda

45 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Kyoko Ueda
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 195
  • Nephrology 61
  • Food Science 147
  • Oncology 171
  • Genetics 59
Replace Serdar Uğraş with:
Serdar Uğraş Türkiye
Young Hee Lim United States
Edward Shanbrom United States
Qingzhu Sun China
Kamal Ivory United Kingdom
Kathryn A. Heel Australia
Yanan Yu China
Ton Naber Netherlands
Jacek Michałkiewicz Poland
Debora Compare Italy
Kyoko Ueda relative to Serdar Uğraş Türkiye Serdar Uğraş's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Serdar Uğraş · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyoko Ueda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyoko Ueda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyoko Ueda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyoko Ueda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyoko Ueda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyoko Ueda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyoko Ueda. The network helps show where Kyoko Ueda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyoko Ueda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyoko Ueda Line = papers co-authored together Kyoko Ueda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003132
2 2013105
3 2003100
4 201694
5 201755
6 200853
7 201141
8 199535
9 200824
10 201722
11 200921
12 200516
13 201210
14 201710
15 20178
16 20128
17
[Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis].
19958
18 20057
19
Protective effect of lipo-prostaglandin E1 on post-ischemic renal failure.
19877
20 20156

About Kyoko Ueda

Kyoko Ueda is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (7 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (4 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (195 citations), Nephrology (61 citations), Food Science (147 citations), Oncology (171 citations) and Genetics (59 citations). Kyoko Ueda has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Kiyohiko Hatake, Takeshi Zendo, Tomoko Higuchi, Kenji Sonomoto, Jiro Nakayama, Masanori Fukao, Kengo Takeuchi, Naoko Tsuyama, Yukinobu Tohya and Ryoko Kawabata. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Hematological Oncology, Supportive Care in Cancer, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Systematic and Applied Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact