Kyle Williams

2.2k citations
57 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

    • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications 6
    • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases 3
    • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 10

Kyle Williams

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Kyle Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Clinical Psychology 545
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Neurology 132
  • Molecular Medicine 43
  • Endocrinology 44
Replace James Martin with:
James Martin United States
Igor Zwir United States
Robert Nadon Canada
J. J. McDowell United States
Kavitha Yaddanapudi United States
Jeanne P. Ryan United States
Wenjing Pan China
Shinya Watanabe Japan
Tomoko Saito Japan
Kyle Williams relative to James Martin United States James Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
James Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Williams. The network helps show where Kyle Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Williams Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011253
2 2016102
3 201098
4 200980
5 200764
6 202052
7 201650
8 201444
9 201443
10 201943
11 201340
12 201739
13 201436
14 200734
15 201434
16 201530
17 202029
18 202028
19 201628
20 201926

About Kyle Williams

Kyle Williams is a scholar working on Neurology, Clinical Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Information Systems, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (10 papers), Topic Modeling (7 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (6 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (5 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (3 papers) and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (545 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Neurology (132 citations), Molecular Medicine (43 citations) and Endocrinology (44 citations). Kyle Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Pittenger, Michael H. Bloch, Jon E. Grant, Craig D. Ellermeier, Jessica L. Hastie, David S. Weiss, David L. Popham, Imed Zitouni, C. Lee Giles and David A. Largaespada. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Journal of Bacteriology, Medical Physics and PLoS Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact