Kyle Radcliff

473 citations
18 papers · 380 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle Radcliff

17 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Kyle Radcliff
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Condensed Matter Physics 278
  • Biomedical Engineering 305
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 182
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 51
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 23
Replace Uijong Bong with:
Uijong Bong South Korea
A. Kling Germany
Ratu Mataira New Zealand
Jing Xia China
Jiabin Yang United Kingdom
W. R. Sheppard United States
Kyekun Cheon South Korea
Rodney A. Badcock New Zealand
Ashleigh Francis United States
Soumen Kar United States
Kyle Radcliff relative to Uijong Bong South Korea Uijong Bong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Uijong Bong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Radcliff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Radcliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Radcliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Radcliff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Radcliff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Radcliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Radcliff. The network helps show where Kyle Radcliff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Radcliff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Radcliff Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Radcliff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202077
2 201665
3 201955
4 202147
5 201742
6 202229
7 202227
8 202310
9 20235
10 20205
11 20205
12 20244
13 20233
14 20242
15 20202
16 20251
17
Mechanical Properties of Superpower and Sunam Rebco Coated Conductors
20181
18 20240

About Kyle Radcliff

Kyle Radcliff is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (16 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (7 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (4 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (2 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (2 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper) and Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (278 citations), Biomedical Engineering (305 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (182 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (51 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (23 citations). Kyle Radcliff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Seungyong Hahn, Kwanglok Kim, Kwangmin Kim, Xinbo Hu, D C van der Laan, Johannes Weiss, Kabindra R. Bhattarai, Arend Nijhuis, V A Anvar and J. Jaroszyński. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity and IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact