Kurt Schock

1.5k citations
17 papers · 724 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Kurt Schock

14 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Kurt Schock
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Development 53
  • Political Science and International Relations 330
  • Sociology and Political Science 598
  • Philosophy 77
  • Public Administration 19
Replace Michael Schaller with:
Michael Schaller United States
Subrata Κ. Mitra Germany
Michael C. Desch United States
Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca Spain
Charles Chatfield United States
Bruce W. Jentleson United States
Manali Desai United States
Miroslav Nincic United States
Donatella Alessandra Della Porta Italy
Sean Chabot United States
Kurt Schock relative to Michael Schaller United States Michael Schaller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Michael Schaller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kurt Schock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kurt Schock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kurt Schock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kurt Schock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kurt Schock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kurt Schock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kurt Schock. The network helps show where Kurt Schock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Kurt Schock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kurt Schock Line = papers co-authored together Kurt Schock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006198
2 199685
3 201380
4 199778
5 199975
6 201556
7 199252
8 200341
9
Civil Resistance: Comparative Perspectives on Nonviolent Struggle
201521
10 200310
11
Civil Resistance Today
201510
12 19999
13 20157
14 20021
15
Introduction: Civil resistance in comparative perspective
20151
16
The Political Moderation Model of Violent Political Conflict: The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on The Relationship Between Economic Inequality and Violent Political Conflict /
19950
17 20100

About Kurt Schock

Kurt Schock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Demography and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (9 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (4 papers), Peace and Human Rights Education (2 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (2 papers), World Systems and Global Transformations (1 paper), Disaster Management and Resilience (1 paper) and Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (53 citations), Political Science and International Relations (330 citations), Sociology and Political Science (598 citations), Philosophy (77 citations) and Public Administration (19 citations). Kurt Schock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jasmin Hristov, J. Craig Jenkins, Erica Chenoweth, Charles Lewis Taylor and Doug Bond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Conflict Resolution, Social Problems, Mobilization An International Quarterly, Social Forces and PS Political Science & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact