Kuldev Singh

9.9k citations
145 papers · 5.1k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Kuldev Singh

137 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Kuldev Singh
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Ophthalmology 3.8k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.4k
  • Neurology 167
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 375
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 174
Replace Jonathan S. Myers with:
Jonathan S. Myers United States
Mukharram M. Bikbov Germany
Liang Xu China
Ronald L. Gross United States
John G. Walt United States
C Alex Harper Australia
Dong Hui Lim South Korea
Małgorzata Mrugacz Poland
Ava Grace Tan Australia
Gabriella Tikellis Australia
Kuldev Singh relative to Jonathan S. Myers United States Jonathan S. Myers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jonathan S. Myers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kuldev Singh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kuldev Singh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kuldev Singh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kuldev Singh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kuldev Singh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kuldev Singh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kuldev Singh. The network helps show where Kuldev Singh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kuldev Singh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kuldev Singh Line = papers co-authored together Kuldev Singh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 145 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991391
2 2008228
3 2011187
4 2004161
5 2000142
6 2014128
7 2012118
8 2007112
9 2006102
10 200295
11 201593
12 200390
13 201487
14 201387
15 199385
16 202285
17 201185
18 201384
19 201383
20 201477

About Kuldev Singh

Kuldev Singh is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Neurology, having authored 145 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (88 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (22 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (15 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (3.8k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.4k citations), Neurology (167 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (375 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (174 citations). Kuldev Singh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shan C. Lin, Sophia Y. Wang, Robert T. Chang, Scott D. Smith, Peter R. Egbert, Brian A. Francis, Henry Jampel, John R. Samples, Elizabeth Hodapp and Donald L. Budenz. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact