Kimberly Ring

10 papers receiving 693 citations

Peers

Kimberly Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Transportation 122
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 310
  • Physiology 210
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 87
  • Applied Psychology 29
Replace Kate A. Heelan with:
Kate A. Heelan United States
William F. Riner United States
Kingsley Akinroye Nigeria
Geneviève Leduc Canada
Duarte Henriques‐Neto Portugal
Jana Pelclová Czechia
Randy Rzewnicki Belgium
Art Salmon Canada
Priscila Missaki Nakamura Brazil
Daniel B. Bornstein United States
Kimberly Ring relative to Kate A. Heelan United States Kate A. Heelan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Kate A. Heelan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Ring. The network helps show where Kimberly Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kimberly Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kimberly Ring Line = papers co-authored together Kimberly Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2006167
2 2004138
3 200591
4 200981
5 200468
6 200865
7 200640
8
Comparison of the validity of anthropometric and bioelectric impedance equations to assess body composition in adolescent girls.
200737
9
Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for estimation of body composition in Black, White and Hispanic adolescent girls.
200629
10 200328
11 20240

About Kimberly Ring

Kimberly Ring is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Transportation, having authored 11 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (1 paper), Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors (1 paper) and Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (122 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (310 citations), Physiology (210 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (87 citations) and Applied Psychology (29 citations). Kimberly Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James F. Sallis, Ariane L. Rung, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Margarita S. Treuth, Robert G. McMurray, Amanda S. Birnbaum, John P. Elder, Carolyn C. Voorhees, Kelly R. Evenson and R. R. Pate. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Hypertension, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Journal of Pediatric Psychology and Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact