Kim Ebert
Impact in
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Capital and Networks
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Latin American and Latino Studies
Papers in
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 14
- Race, History, and American Society 2
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 2
- Policy Transfer and Learning 1
- Co-authors
- Dina G. Okamoto (7 shared papers)Sarah M. Ovink (2 shared papers)Drew Halfmann (1 shared paper)Lisa Sun-Hee Park (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Behavioral Scientist (4 papers)Social Problems (3 papers)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (2 papers)PS Political Science & Politics (1 paper)Latino Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kim Ebert
19 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Sociology and Political Science 254
- Cultural Studies 25
- Communication 17
- Urban Studies 13
- Demography 18
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Ebert. The network helps show where Kim Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Kim Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Kim Ebert
Kim Ebert is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Cultural Studies and Demography, having authored 20 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (14 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper), Policy Transfer and Learning (1 paper) and Public Health Policies and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (254 citations), Cultural Studies (25 citations), Communication (17 citations), Urban Studies (13 citations) and Demography (18 citations). Kim Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dina G. Okamoto, Sarah M. Ovink, Drew Halfmann and Lisa Sun-Hee Park. Their work appears in journals such as American Behavioral Scientist, Social Problems, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, PS Political Science & Politics and Latino Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.