Khaled Moaddy

733 citations
21 papers · 577 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Khaled Moaddy

21 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

Khaled Moaddy
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Modeling and Simulation 345
  • Numerical Analysis 146
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 246
  • Applied Mathematics 85
  • Statistics and Probability 41
Replace Deliang Qian with:
Deliang Qian China
Zhen-Guo Deng China
Wei‐Hua Luo China
Yunru Bai Poland
Israr Ahmad Oman
Jafar Saberi‐Nadjafi Iran
M. Mossa Al-Sawalha Saudi Arabia
Alireza Ansari Iran
Muhammet Kurulay Türkiye
M. Matinfar Iran
Khaled Moaddy relative to Deliang Qian China Deliang Qian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Deliang Qian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Khaled Moaddy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Khaled Moaddy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khaled Moaddy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khaled Moaddy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Khaled Moaddy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khaled Moaddy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khaled Moaddy. The network helps show where Khaled Moaddy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Khaled Moaddy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Khaled Moaddy Line = papers co-authored together Khaled Moaddy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012112
2 201392
3 201174
4 201155
5 201643
6 201631
7 201530
8 201827
9 201125
10 201319
11 202316
12 201610
13 202410
14 202310
15 20237
16 20177
17 20173
18
A new hybrid non-standard finite difference-adomian scheme for solution of nonlinear equations
20112
19 20112
20 20241

About Khaled Moaddy

Khaled Moaddy is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Numerical Analysis, Computer Networks and Communications and Applied Mathematics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (15 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (7 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (6 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (6 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (5 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (2 papers) and Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (345 citations), Numerical Analysis (146 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (246 citations), Applied Mathematics (85 citations) and Statistics and Probability (41 citations). Khaled Moaddy has collaborated with scholars based in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Ishak Hashim, Shaher Momani, Ahmed G. Radwan, K. Saláma, Mohammed Al‐Smadi, Salah Abuasad, Asad Freihat, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Rasool Shah and Abdul Hamid Ganie. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Abstract and Applied Analysis, Scientific Reports, The Journal of Difference Equations and Applications and Journal of King Saud University - Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact