Kerem İnanoğlu

435 citations
23 papers · 269 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kerem İnanoğlu

23 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Kerem İnanoğlu
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 41
  • Surgery 110
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 47
  • Oral Surgery 10
  • Physiology 31
Replace Ajeet Kumar with:
Ajeet Kumar India
Nesrin Bozdoğan Türkiye
Binay Kumar Biswas Nepal
Ayşin Alagöl Türkiye
J Deschodt France
J. C. Stuart Hong Kong
Paolo Grossi Italy
P.D.W. Fettes United Kingdom
Nobutaka Kariya Japan
Claire Dawkins United Kingdom
Kerem İnanoğlu relative to Ajeet Kumar India Ajeet Kumar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ajeet Kumar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kerem İnanoğlu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kerem İnanoğlu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerem İnanoğlu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerem İnanoğlu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kerem İnanoğlu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerem İnanoğlu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerem İnanoğlu. The network helps show where Kerem İnanoğlu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kerem İnanoğlu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kerem İnanoğlu Line = papers co-authored together Kerem İnanoğlu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200650
2 201635
3 200932
4 201521
5
Intravenous ketamine and local bupivacaine infiltration are effective as part of a multimodal regime for reducing post-tonsillectomy pain.
200918
6 200714
7 201313
8 200913
9 201610
10 20159
11 20179
12 20177
13 20167
14 20106
15 20155
16 20075
17 20084
18 20104
19 20212
20 20082

About Kerem İnanoğlu

Kerem İnanoğlu is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (2 papers), Abdominal Surgery and Complications (2 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (41 citations), Surgery (110 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (47 citations), Oral Surgery (10 citations) and Physiology (31 citations). Kerem İnanoğlu has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Ertap Akoğlu, Şemsettin Okuyucu, Ali Sait Kavaklı, Nilgün Kavrut Öztürk, Selim Turhanoğlu, Mustafa Emmıler, Muhyittin Temiz, Ahmet Aslan, Bilge Karslı and Sadık Görür. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Pain Research and Management, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact