Kenneth Moats
Impact in
-
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Nuclear physics research studies
-
- Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Papers in
-
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 7
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 7
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 6
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 1
- Co-authors
- Stephen Godfrey (5 shared papers)Eric S. Swanson (1 shared paper)Tom G. Steele (1 shared paper)Travis Martin (2 shared papers)Pat Kalyniak (2 shared papers)Thomas Grégoire (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Physical review. D (2 papers)Journal of High Energy Physics (1 paper)Nuclear Physics A (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kenneth Moats
7 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 385
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 46
- Modeling and Simulation 6
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 16
- Applied Mathematics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Moats
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Moats's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Moats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Moats more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Moats
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Moats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Moats. The network helps show where Kenneth Moats may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Moats, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 |
About Kenneth Moats
Kenneth Moats is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Insect Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (7 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (385 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (46 citations), Modeling and Simulation (6 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (16 citations) and Applied Mathematics (6 citations). Kenneth Moats has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Godfrey, Eric S. Swanson, Tom G. Steele, Travis Martin, Pat Kalyniak and Thomas Grégoire. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Nuclear Physics A and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.