Kenneth Good

1.7k citations
46 papers · 969 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Kenneth Good

45 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Kenneth Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Development 164
  • Anthropology 235
  • Archeology 17
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 112
  • Sociology and Political Science 490
Replace Abdi Ismail Samatar with:
Abdi Ismail Samatar United States
Jane L. Parpart United States
Alex Vines United Kingdom
David Seddon United Kingdom
Finn Stepputat Denmark
Ewout Frankema Netherlands
Christopher Fyfe United Kingdom
Peter C. W. Gutkind Canada
John Gledhill Austria
Jon Abbink Netherlands
Kenneth Good relative to Abdi Ismail Samatar United States Abdi Ismail Samatar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Abdi Ismail Samatar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Good. The network helps show where Kenneth Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Good Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006115
2 199294
3 200193
4 199473
5 199967
6 200852
7 199350
8 197647
9 199642
10 199627
11 200825
12
Bushmen and diamonds : (un)civil society in Botswana
200324
13 199922
14 200519
15 197418
16 199717
17 200217
18 198914
19 198614
20 196813

About Kenneth Good

Kenneth Good is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Development and Law, having authored 46 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (15 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (12 papers), South African History and Culture (12 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (3 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (3 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (3 papers) and Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (164 citations), Anthropology (235 citations), Archeology (17 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (112 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (490 citations). Kenneth Good has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Botswana and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Abdi Ismail Samatar, Ruth Willis, Clive Nettleton, Ian L. Taylor, Mike Donaldson, Ian Taylor and Leslie E. Sponsel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Modern African Studies, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, African Affairs, Democratization and Commonwealth and Comparative Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact