Kenneth E. Williams

66 papers receiving 989 citations

Peers

Kenneth E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Cell Biology 249
  • Physiology 168
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 46
  • Language and Linguistics 70
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 98
Replace Mitch Leslie with:
Mitch Leslie United States
Solomon F.D. Paul India
Lihua Xie China
Ken Ohnishi Japan
Christopher Browne United States
Hiroshi Kondo Japan
Caroline L. Smith United Kingdom
Morton W. Miller United States
Afshin Beheshti United States
Hiroshi Ohashi Japan
Kenneth E. Williams relative to Mitch Leslie United States Mitch Leslie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Mitch Leslie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Williams. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975134
2 197587
3 197777
4 197765
5 197757
6 200956
7 197653
8 201852
9 199148
10 199134
11 198034
12 197130
13 198129
14 197929
15 197718
16 198717
17 198416
18 197914
19 200413
20 197613

About Kenneth E. Williams

Kenneth E. Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering and Physiology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (11 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (10 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (9 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (8 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (6 papers), Animal health and immunology (4 papers), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (4 papers) and Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (249 citations), Physiology (168 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (46 citations), Language and Linguistics (70 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (98 citations). Kenneth E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include John B. Lloyd, Felix Beck, Geoffrey Livesey, Melvin R. Andrade, Margaret K. Pratten, F J Ballard, S E Knowles, Glyn B. Steventon, Malcolm Davies and Brian R. Page. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Journal, Biochemical Society Transactions, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Chemico-Biological Interactions and Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact