Kenneth E. Pengel

839 citations
15 papers · 672 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Kenneth E. Pengel

15 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

Kenneth E. Pengel
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Cancer Research 260
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 278
  • Radiation 64
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 100
  • Otorhinolaryngology 14
Replace C. Chapellier with:
C. Chapellier France
S.J. Zimmermann Denmark
D.W. Arthur United States
Karolien Verhoeven Netherlands
G.S. Gustafson United States
Anna Morra Italy
Nicola Letts United States
Kai J. Borm Germany
S. Hol Netherlands
Kenji Yutani Japan
Kenneth E. Pengel relative to C. Chapellier France C. Chapellier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
C. Chapellier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Pengel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Pengel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Pengel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Pengel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Pengel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Pengel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Pengel. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Pengel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth E. Pengel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth E. Pengel Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth E. Pengel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2005153
2 200898
3 201188
4 201376
5 201350
6 201440
7 201032
8 201532
9 201324
10 201619
11 201717
12 201216
13 201316
14 201710
15 20121

About Kenneth E. Pengel

Kenneth E. Pengel is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 15 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (260 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (278 citations), Radiation (64 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (100 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (14 citations). Kenneth E. Pengel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emiel J. Rutgers, Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs, Claudette E. Loo, Jelle Wesseling, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, Wouter V. Vogel, Wilma D. Heemsbergen, Maddalena Rossi, Joos V. Lebesque and J. Belderbos. Their work appears in journals such as Radiotherapy and Oncology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, European Journal of Cancer and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact