Keith D Ewing

103 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Keith D Ewing
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Public Administration 243
  • Library and Information Sciences 33
  • Law 156
  • Political Science and International Relations 328
  • General Health Professions 124
Replace Cynthia J. Bowling with:
Cynthia J. Bowling United States
Josie Kelly United Kingdom
Norman J. Ornstein United States
Howard Elcock United Kingdom
Jon Erik Dølvik Norway
Luc Rouban France
Meg Russell United Kingdom
Susan M. Miller United States
Anchrit Wille Netherlands
Ralph S. Hambrick United States
Keith D Ewing relative to Cynthia J. Bowling United States Cynthia J. Bowling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.5×
Cynthia J. Bowling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith D Ewing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith D Ewing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith D Ewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith D Ewing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith D Ewing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith D Ewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith D Ewing. The network helps show where Keith D Ewing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith D Ewing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith D Ewing Line = papers co-authored together Keith D Ewing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199543
2 199940
3 200540
4 201034
5
The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act
200822
6
The Futility of the Human Rights Act
200420
7 200117
8 199217
9 200114
10
A Manifesto for Labour Law: towards a comprehensive revision of workers' rights
201614
11 201213
12 202012
13 199812
14 201711
15 201311
16 200311
17
Money, politics, and law
199210
18 201710
19 19909
20 19919

About Keith D Ewing

Keith D Ewing is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Industrial relations, having authored 124 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (58 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (23 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (11 papers), European and International Law Studies (11 papers), Legal principles and applications (10 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (9 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (9 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (243 citations), Library and Information Sciences (33 citations), Law (156 citations), Political Science and International Relations (328 citations) and General Health Professions (124 citations). Keith D Ewing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert Hauptman, Conor Gearty, Joo‐Cheong Tham, Peter Nolan, Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, Sian Moore, Aileen McColgan, Stephen Wood, Alan Bogg and Andrew Grubb. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, The Cambridge Law Journal, Modern Law Review, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy and International Journal of Law in Context.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact