Kees Verhoef
Impact in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Papers in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 2
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 2
-
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 3
- Co-authors
- Ria van Boxtel (1 shared paper)Loek van Alphen (1 shared paper)Ben J. J. Lugtenberg (1 shared paper)Linetta B. Koppert (1 shared paper)David van Klaveren (1 shared paper)Marc B. I. Lobbes (1 shared paper)Carmen C. van der Pol (1 shared paper)Janine M. Simons (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Oncology (2 papers)International Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Value in Health (2 papers)Clinical Breast Cancer (1 paper)HPB (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Kees Verhoef
17 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cancer Research 82
- Hepatology 32
- Oncology 75
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 29
- Immunology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Kees Verhoef
This map shows the geographic impact of Kees Verhoef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees Verhoef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees Verhoef more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kees Verhoef
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees Verhoef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees Verhoef. The network helps show where Kees Verhoef may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kees Verhoef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 5 | Long-term Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Organ-Sparing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Distal Rectal Cancer The CARTS Study | 2019 | 21 |
| 6 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 11 | Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer A Review | 2021 | 8 |
| 12 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 |
About Kees Verhoef
Kees Verhoef is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Hepatology, Oncology, Rheumatology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (82 citations), Hepatology (32 citations), Oncology (75 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (29 citations) and Immunology (30 citations). Kees Verhoef has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Ria van Boxtel, Loek van Alphen, Ben J. J. Lugtenberg, Linetta B. Koppert, David van Klaveren, Marc B. I. Lobbes, Carmen C. van der Pol, Janine M. Simons, Maaike de Boer and Boen L.R. Kam. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, International Journal of Cancer, Value in Health, Clinical Breast Cancer and HPB.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.