Kate Grieve

3.0k citations
97 papers · 2.0k · h-index 26

Impact in

  • Biophysics top 0.5%
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments

Papers in

Kate Grieve

90 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Kate Grieve
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Biophysics 622
  • Ophthalmology 627
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 774
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.2k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 12
Replace Maciej Szkulmowski with:
Maciej Szkulmowski Poland
Ireneusz Grulkowski Poland
Kostadinka Bizheva Canada
Iwona Gorczyńska Poland
Shuliang Jiao United States
James Jiang United States
Angelika Unterhuber Austria
Masahiro Yamanari Japan
Boris Považay Austria
Erich Götzinger Austria
Kate Grieve relative to Maciej Szkulmowski Poland Maciej Szkulmowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Maciej Szkulmowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Grieve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Grieve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Grieve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Grieve. The network helps show where Kate Grieve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Grieve Line = papers co-authored together Kate Grieve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004268
2 2013126
3 2004101
4 200895
5 200493
6 200480
7 201579
8 200578
9 201873
10 201059
11 201856
12 200946
13 200643
14 200639
15 201739
16 201736
17 201435
18 201935
19 202235
20 201834

About Kate Grieve

Kate Grieve is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Biophysics and Epidemiology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (56 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (25 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (23 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (20 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (19 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (19 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (18 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (622 citations), Ophthalmology (627 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (774 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.2k citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (12 citations). Kate Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Claude Boccara, Arnaud Dubois, Michel Pâques, José‐Alain Sahel, Austin Roorda, Gaël Moneron, Olivier Thouvenin, Vincent Borderie, Romain Lecaque and Laurent Vabre. Their work appears in journals such as Biomedical Optics Express, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optics Letters, Optics Express and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact