Kate Grieve

3.1k citations
101 papers · 2.2k · h-index 27

Impact in

  • Biophysics top 0.5%
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments

Papers in

Kate Grieve

93 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Kate Grieve
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Biophysics 605
  • Ophthalmology 522
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 731
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.3k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 13
Replace Maciej Szkulmowski with:
Maciej Szkulmowski Poland
Ireneusz Grulkowski Poland
Shuliang Jiao United States
Iwona Gorczyńska Poland
James Jiang United States
Kostadinka Bizheva Canada
Nader A. Nassif United States
Erich Götzinger Austria
Boris Považay Austria
Masahiro Yamanari Japan
Kate Grieve relative to Maciej Szkulmowski Poland Maciej Szkulmowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Maciej Szkulmowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Grieve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Grieve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Grieve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Grieve. The network helps show where Kate Grieve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Grieve Line = papers co-authored together Kate Grieve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004287
2 2013135
3 2004109
4 2008100
5 200499
6 200485
7 200585
8 201584
9 201876
10 201060
11 201858
12 200952
13 200649
14 200642
15 201741
16 202237
17 201937
18 201737
19 201436
20 201836

About Kate Grieve

Kate Grieve is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Biophysics and Epidemiology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (57 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (23 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (22 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (18 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (17 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (17 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (605 citations), Ophthalmology (522 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (731 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.3k citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (13 citations). Kate Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claude Boccara, Arnaud Dubois, Michel Pâques, José‐Alain Sahel, Austin Roorda, Gaël Moneron, Olivier Thouvenin, Vincent Borderie, Romain Lecaque and Laurent Vabre. Their work appears in journals such as Biomedical Optics Express, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optics Letters, Scientific Reports and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact