Karl E. Wende

1.8k citations
13 papers · 1.6k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Karl E. Wende

13 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Karl E. Wende
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
  • Neurology 409
  • Developmental Neuroscience 90
  • Rheumatology 277
  • Neurology 116
Replace C.H. Polman with:
C.H. Polman Netherlands
Gianfranco Siracusa Italy
Davide Nasuelli Italy
Irene Mattisi Italy
Jean‐Christophe Ouallet France
Valentina Bernardi Italy
Antonio Scalfari United Kingdom
Christina J. Azevedo United States
María Jesús Arévalo Spain
Peter Brex United Kingdom
Karl E. Wende relative to C.H. Polman Netherlands C.H. Polman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C.H. Polman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karl E. Wende

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karl E. Wende's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karl E. Wende with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karl E. Wende more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karl E. Wende

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karl E. Wende. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karl E. Wende. The network helps show where Karl E. Wende may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karl E. Wende, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karl E. Wende Line = papers co-authored together Karl E. Wende links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1998291
2 1999288
3 2000250
4 1992182
5 2000148
6 1999121
7 2000114
8 199987
9 200032
10 199821
11 200318
12 20035
13 19881

About Karl E. Wende

Karl E. Wende is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (11 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper) and Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations), Neurology (409 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (90 citations), Rheumatology (277 citations) and Neurology (116 citations). Karl E. Wende has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Diane L. Cookfair, Carol M. Brownscheidle, L. Jacobs, Ruth H. Whitham, Barbara Scherokman, D Goodkin, Patrick M. Pullicino, DENNIS N. BOURDETTE, Marilyn Campion and F. E. Munschauer. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Annals of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Journal of Neuroimmunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact