Kaleigh Smith

883 citations
11 papers · 619 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Kaleigh Smith

11 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Kaleigh Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 89
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 241
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 286
  • Media Technology 102
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 34
Replace Gwenaël Doërr with:
Gwenaël Doërr France
Rocı́o González-Dı́az Spain
M. Hassner United States
Bo Ou China
Gonzalo Urcid Mexico
Xiang Huang China
Hongyun Gao China
Chakravarthy Bhagvati India
Alessia De Rosa Italy
Jean‐Philippe Domenger France
Kaleigh Smith relative to Gwenaël Doërr France Gwenaël Doërr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Gwenaël Doërr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kaleigh Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kaleigh Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaleigh Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaleigh Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kaleigh Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaleigh Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaleigh Smith. The network helps show where Kaleigh Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Kaleigh Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kaleigh Smith Line = papers co-authored together Kaleigh Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2004254
2 2008142
3
Colour Normalisation in Digital Histopathology Images
2009100
4 200840
5 200638
6 200525
7 20097
8 20086
9 20253
10 20042
11
Automatic Pen-and-Ink Illustration of Tone, Gloss, And Texture
20102

About Kaleigh Smith

Kaleigh Smith is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Media Technology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Image Enhancement Techniques (5 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), Color Science and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (3 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (2 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper) and Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (89 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (241 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (286 citations), Media Technology (102 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (34 citations). Kaleigh Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Vetta, Bruce Reed, Karol Myszkowski, Joëlle Thollot, Hans‐Peter Seidel, D. Crellin, Darren Treanor, Philip Quirke, Michael Shires and Derek Magee. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Graphics Forum, Journal of Computational Biology, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Operations Research Letters and Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact