K. Behler

1.5k citations
45 papers · 410 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

K. Behler

42 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

K. Behler
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 338
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 154
  • Aerospace Engineering 113
  • Computer Networks and Communications 73
  • Biomedical Engineering 110
Replace G. Neu with:
G. Neu Germany
D. Zasche Germany
M. Emoto Japan
J. Guasp Spain
F. Janky Czechia
A. Winter France
J. Havlíček Czechia
F. Milani Italy
H. J. de Blank Germany
J. M. Moller United States
K. Behler relative to G. Neu Germany G. Neu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
G. Neu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Behler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Behler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Behler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Behler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Behler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Behler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Behler. The network helps show where K. Behler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Behler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Behler Line = papers co-authored together K. Behler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201053
2 200045
3 201137
4 200025
5 199920
6 198717
7 201016
8 200316
9 201013
10 200912
11 200811
12 199910
13 201010
14 200310
15 20079
16 20128
17 20118
18 20068
19 20068
20 19786

About K. Behler

K. Behler is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 45 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (40 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (15 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (12 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (7 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (6 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers) and GNSS positioning and interference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (338 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (154 citations), Aerospace Engineering (113 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (73 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (110 citations). K. Behler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Japan. Frequent co-authors include W. Treutterer, G. Raupp, R. Merkel, M. Zilker, A. Lohs, G. Neu, A. Mlynek, M. Reich, H. J. de Blank and H. Bruhns. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Science & Technology, Review of Scientific Instruments and Applied Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact