J.W. Scott

2.0k citations
52 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

J.W. Scott

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

J.W. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 961
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.4k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 23
  • Hardware and Architecture 16
  • Biomedical Engineering 103
Replace M. Kitamura with:
M. Kitamura Japan
R. E. Leibenguth United States
Michael J. Wale Netherlands
D. P. Wilt United States
B. R. Hemenway United States
T. Ikegami Japan
Laurent Chusseau France
Roger Helkey United States
S.P. Hui United States
Y. Baeyens United States
J.W. Scott relative to M. Kitamura Japan M. Kitamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Kitamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.W. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.W. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.W. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.W. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.W. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.W. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.W. Scott. The network helps show where J.W. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.W. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.W. Scott Line = papers co-authored together J.W. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989212
2 1990138
3 1993127
4 1996123
5 1993112
6 198890
7 199379
8 199644
9 199442
10 199342
11 199437
12 199533
13 198932
14 199431
15 199330
16 199327
17 198926
18 199626
19 199323
20 199521

About J.W. Scott

J.W. Scott is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (42 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (36 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (35 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers), Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies (3 papers), Laser Design and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Data Compression Techniques (2 papers) and Digital Filter Design and Implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (961 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.4k citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (23 citations), Hardware and Architecture (16 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (103 citations). J.W. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include L.A. Coldren, S. Corzine, R.S. Geels, D.B. Young, B.J. Thibeault, Frank H. Peters, Ran Yan, Matthew Peters, K.L. Lear and Mial E. Warren. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Electronics Letters and IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact