Julia Shaw

686 citations
56 papers · 306 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Shaw

52 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Julia Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Space and Planetary Science 16
  • Anthropology 76
  • Geography, Planning and Development 41
  • Religious studies 30
  • Paleontology 38
Replace O. Nigel Bolland with:
O. Nigel Bolland United States
Barrie Sharpe United Kingdom
Tina Loo Canada
James Fergusson Canada
James P. Ronda United States
Brian R. Hamnett United Kingdom
Elizabeth Baigent United Kingdom
Peter Iverson United States
Zeynep Çelík United States
Steve Hemming Australia
Julia Shaw relative to O. Nigel Bolland United States O. Nigel Bolland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
O. Nigel Bolland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Shaw. The network helps show where Julia Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Julia Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Julia Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200118
2 200318
3 201316
4 201113
5 201713
6 200012
7 200312
8 200911
9
Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, c. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD
201311
10 200411
11 201611
12 200410
13 201310
14 200510
15 200010
16 19948
17 20168
18 20237
19 20187
20 20157

About Julia Shaw

Julia Shaw is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Law and Religious studies, having authored 56 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (8 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (7 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (7 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (16 citations), Anthropology (76 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (41 citations), Religious studies (30 citations) and Paleontology (38 citations). Julia Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include J. V. Sutcliffe, Hillary J. Shaw, Naomi Sykes, Michael Salter, Richard Salomon, Penny Jane Burke, Julia Coffey, Barry W. Fudge, Stephen A. Ingham and Simon Smart. Their work appears in journals such as World Archaeology, Social Responsibility Journal, South Asian Studies, Hydrological Sciences Journal and The British Journal of Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact