Julia Shaw

721 citations
65 papers · 440 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Shaw

56 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Julia Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Space and Planetary Science 24
  • Anthropology 114
  • Geography, Planning and Development 56
  • Religious studies 47
  • Paleontology 49
Replace O. Nigel Bolland with:
O. Nigel Bolland United States
D. Fairchild Ruggles United States
Anne Marie Claire Godlewska Canada
Daniel Martin Varisco United States
Peter Skalník Czechia
Thomas Barfield United States
Roberto Carlos Cipriani Italy
Henry H. Glassie United States
Joost Fontein United Kingdom
James P. Ronda United States
Julia Shaw relative to O. Nigel Bolland United States O. Nigel Bolland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
O. Nigel Bolland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Shaw. The network helps show where Julia Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Julia Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Julia Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200334
2
Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, c. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD
201330
3 200124
4 201322
5 201321
6 200420
7 201718
8 200918
9 200318
10 200016
11 201114
12 201613
13 200412
14 200512
15 200012
16 201611
17 19949
18 20238
19 20157
20 20137

About Julia Shaw

Julia Shaw is a scholar working on Anthropology, Religious studies, Law, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (10 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (9 papers), Law in Society and Culture (9 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (8 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (24 citations), Anthropology (114 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (56 citations), Religious studies (47 citations) and Paleontology (49 citations). Julia Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include John V. Sutcliffe, Hillary J. Shaw, Michael W. Salter, Naomi Sykes, Richard G. Salomon, Penny Jane Burke, Julia Coffey, Barry W. Fudge, JAMIE S. M. PRINGLE and Stephen A. Ingham. Their work appears in journals such as World Archaeology, Social Responsibility Journal, South Asian Studies, The British Journal of Social Work and International Journal of Law in Context.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact