Julia Schmid
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 17
- Physiology 15
- Physical Activity and Health 14
- Co-authors
- Sigrid Elsenbruch (9 shared papers)Sylvia Kirchengast (3 shared papers)Sven Benson (5 shared papers)Michael Forsting (5 shared papers)Johannes C. Huber (2 shared papers)Elisabeth Vytiska‐Binstorfer (2 shared papers)Achim Conzelmann (19 shared papers)Nina Theysohn (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cryogenics (3 papers)Animal Welfare (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (2 papers)BMC Public Health (2 papers)Pain (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Julia Schmid
74 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Reproductive Medicine 162
- Applied Psychology 88
- Cognitive Neuroscience 245
- Gastroenterology 57
- Complementary and alternative medicine 80
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schmid
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schmid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schmid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schmid. The network helps show where Julia Schmid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 126 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 60 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 16 | 1970 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 18 |
About Julia Schmid
Julia Schmid is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Physiology, Social Psychology, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (17 papers), Physical Activity and Health (14 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (12 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (7 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (162 citations), Applied Psychology (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (245 citations), Gastroenterology (57 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (80 citations). Julia Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Sigrid Elsenbruch, Sylvia Kirchengast, Sven Benson, Michael Forsting, Johannes C. Huber, Elisabeth Vytiska‐Binstorfer, Achim Conzelmann, Nina Theysohn, Dorothea Kübler and Gorden Sudeck. Their work appears in journals such as Cryogenics, Animal Welfare, Frontiers in Psychology, BMC Public Health and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.