Julia S. Benoit

44 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

Julia S. Benoit
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Ophthalmology 87
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 27
  • Neurology 80
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 73
Replace Christine Taylor with:
Christine Taylor Australia
Mark Foster United Kingdom
Megan Boysen‐Osborn United States
Matthew L. Bush United States
David Breiger United States
Patricia H. Ellison United States
Juliet Haarbauer‐Krupa United States
Nick Reed Canada
Jennifer Preston United Kingdom
Matthew Anson United Kingdom
Julia S. Benoit relative to Christine Taylor Australia Christine Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Christine Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia S. Benoit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia S. Benoit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia S. Benoit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia S. Benoit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia S. Benoit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia S. Benoit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia S. Benoit. The network helps show where Julia S. Benoit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia S. Benoit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia S. Benoit Line = papers co-authored together Julia S. Benoit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994156
2 201689
3 201876
4 201871
5 201561
6 201839
7 200933
8 201530
9 201724
10 202024
11 202123
12 201821
13 202120
14 201915
15 201914
16 202013
17 201513
18 201811
19 201811
20 202111

About Julia S. Benoit

Julia S. Benoit is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 45 papers that have together received 863 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (87 citations), Clinical Psychology (136 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (27 citations), Neurology (80 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (73 citations). Julia S. Benoit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Zimmer, Sue E. Estroff, William S. Lachicotte, José‐Miguel Yamal, Claudia S. Robertson, David J. Francis, Pratik Doshi, Shankar P. Gopinath, Paulina A. Kulesz and Heather A. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Journal of Neurotrauma, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care and Obesity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact