Julia Potter

13 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Julia Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Rehabilitation 50
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 39
  • Physiology 113
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 61
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
Replace C. Jimenez with:
C. Jimenez France
C M. Falco United States
Loek Wouters Netherlands
Gurinder Bains United States
H. Samuel Case United States
F. T. Hacker United States
M. V. Savage United States
Alexandra Malgoyre France
Tzai‐Li Li Taiwan
Kelsey Bourbeau United States
Julia Potter relative to C. Jimenez France C. Jimenez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
C. Jimenez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Potter. The network helps show where Julia Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Potter Line = papers co-authored together Julia Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2005192
2 200333
3 201426
4 201925
5 202017
6 202016
7
Supra-maximal effort and reaction and movement times in a non-compatible response time task.
200514
8
The effectiveness of chocolate milk as a post-climbing recovery aid.
201510
9 20073
10
Chocolate Milk Improves Post-Exercise recovery in Tennis Players
20183
11 20241
12 20231
13
Effect of New Zealand Blackcurrant on Sports Climbing Performance
20181

About Julia Potter

Julia Potter is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Sports Performance and Training (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (2 papers), Landslides and related hazards (2 papers), Rock Mechanics and Modeling (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (50 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (39 citations), Physiology (113 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (61 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations). Julia Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jon Swain, Terry McMorris, Simon K. Delves, Jo Corbett, Marcus S. Smith, Craig Sale, Roger C. Harris, Mark E. T. Willems, John Sproule and Simon Fryer. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Human Reproduction, International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, International Journal of Psychophysiology, European Journal of Applied Physiology and European Journal of Sport Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact