Julia Moellmann

887 citations
31 papers · 693 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Moellmann

29 papers receiving 685 citations

Peers

Julia Moellmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Nephrology 108
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 164
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 179
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
Replace Kenji Tsuji with:
Kenji Tsuji Japan
Hongjie Wang China
Liyao Fu China
Lindsay A. Guare United States
Guannan Li China
Menglu Liu China
Hongling Zhu China
Xiaoliang Zhang China
Annegreet G. Veldhuis‐Vlug Netherlands
Mingqiang Fu China
Julia Moellmann relative to Kenji Tsuji Japan Kenji Tsuji's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Kenji Tsuji · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Moellmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Moellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Moellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Moellmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Moellmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Moellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Moellmann. The network helps show where Julia Moellmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Moellmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Moellmann Line = papers co-authored together Julia Moellmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020129
2 202269
3 201859
4 202058
5 202252
6 202240
7 201937
8 201533
9 202129
10 201823
11 201922
12 201818
13 202217
14 202114
15 202314
16 201610
17 201810
18 20209
19 20239
20 20207

About Julia Moellmann

Julia Moellmann is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Nephrology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Treatment and Management (10 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (8 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (7 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (108 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (164 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (179 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations). Julia Moellmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Lehrke, Nikolaus Marx, Peter Böör, Barbara Mara Klinkhammer, Rafael Kramann, Corinna Lebherz, Florian Kahles, Patrick Droste, Joachim Jankowski and Ben Arpad Kappel. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, Scientific Reports, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism and Journal of the American Heart Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact