Julia M. Eckert

1.1k citations
64 papers · 420 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Julia M. Eckert

49 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Julia M. Eckert
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Anthropology 69
  • Political Science and International Relations 162
  • Sociology and Political Science 223
  • Law 46
  • Urban Studies 28
Replace Italo Pardo with:
Italo Pardo United Kingdom
Ranabir Samaddar India
Alice M. Nah United Kingdom
Beatrice Jauregui Canada
Louiza Odysseos United Kingdom
Oliver Mendelsohn Australia
Keally D. McBride United States
Ina Kerner Germany
Mike Brogden United Kingdom
T. R. H. Davenport South Africa
Julia M. Eckert relative to Italo Pardo United Kingdom Italo Pardo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
Italo Pardo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Eckert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Eckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Eckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Eckert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Eckert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Eckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Eckert. The network helps show where Julia M. Eckert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Julia M. Eckert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia M. Eckert Line = papers co-authored together Julia M. Eckert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200647
2 202132
3 200328
4 201625
5
The Charisma of Direct Action: Power, Politics and the Shiv Sena
200324
6 201120
7 200819
8 201219
9 200418
10 201216
11
Transnationale Solidarität : Chancen und Grenzen
200416
12 202014
13 201613
14 202010
15
The future is distributed: a vision of sustainable economies
20098
16 20047
17 20126
18
Towards an Anthropology of Governance
20036
19 20086
20 20166

About Julia M. Eckert

Julia M. Eckert is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Anthropology and Philosophy, having authored 64 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (6 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers), International Law and Human Rights (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (69 citations), Political Science and International Relations (162 citations), Sociology and Political Science (223 citations), Law (46 citations) and Urban Studies (28 citations). Julia M. Eckert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gerrit Füldner, Lena Schnabel, Wolfgang Streeck, Jens Beckert, Martin A. Kohli, Andrea Behrends, Bernt‐Peter Robra, Philipp Dann, Bodo Vogt and Marcel Lichters. Their work appears in journals such as Anthropological Theory, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Social Science History, Citizenship Studies and Social Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact