Julia Langham

1.1k citations
38 papers · 764 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Langham

36 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

Julia Langham
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Rheumatology 153
  • Neurology 130
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Ishan Paranjpe with:
Ishan Paranjpe United States
Leticia León Spain
Mark Arnold Australia
Christine Iannaccone United States
Rachel E. Sobel United States
Hyunsun Lim South Korea
Yu‐Sheng Lin Taiwan
Shayan Mostafaei Iran
Céline Chapelle France
Hélène Beaussier France
Julia Langham relative to Ishan Paranjpe United States Ishan Paranjpe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Ishan Paranjpe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Langham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Langham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Langham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Langham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Langham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Langham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Langham. The network helps show where Julia Langham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Langham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Langham Line = papers co-authored together Julia Langham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200391
2 202060
3 201358
4 200852
5 202150
6 202045
7 201145
8 202439
9 199938
10 201925
11 201524
12
Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a randomised trial of training in information management, evidence-based medicine, both or neither: the PIER trial.
200221
13 202120
14 201818
15 202417
16 197017
17 202114
18 201213
19 200912
20 202311

About Julia Langham

Julia Langham is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ophthalmology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (2 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (2 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (18 citations), Rheumatology (153 citations), Neurology (130 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Family Practice (7 citations). Julia Langham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sue Langham, Kathy Rowan, Barnabas Desta, Xia Wang, Edward R. Hammond, Nick Pooley, Graham M. Teasdale, Caroline Goldfrad, Donald Shaw and Nina Embleton. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, The Lancet Psychiatry, Health Physics, Rheumatology and Therapy and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact