Julia Crouse
Impact in
- Demography top 2%
- Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
- Applied Psychology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 2
-
- Educational Games and Gamification 2
- Children's Physical and Motor Development 1
- Co-authors
- Wei Peng (3 shared papers)Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin (2 shared papers)Jessica Vitak (2 shared papers)Robert LaRose (1 shared paper)Caitlin McLaughlin (1 shared paper)Sriram Kalyanaraman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (2 papers)Health Education & Behavior (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Julia Crouse
5 papers receiving 921 citations
Julia Crouse's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Demography 274
- Applied Psychology 81
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 204
- Human-Computer Interaction 87
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 36
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Crouse
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Crouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Crouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Crouse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Crouse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Crouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Crouse. The network helps show where Julia Crouse may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Julia Crouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 349 | |
| 2 | Personal Internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 313 |
| 3 | 2012 | 244 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 6 | Wiimote Possibilities: The Effects of Types of Game Controller and Character Perspective | 2010 | 1 |
About Julia Crouse
Julia Crouse is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 984 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Physical Activity and Health (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies (1 paper), Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior (1 paper), Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior (1 paper) and Children's Physical and Motor Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (274 citations), Applied Psychology (81 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (204 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (87 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (36 citations). Julia Crouse has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Wei Peng, Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin, Jessica Vitak, Robert LaRose, Caitlin McLaughlin and Sriram Kalyanaraman. Their work appears in journals such as Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Health Education & Behavior and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.