Juergen Hoerer

7 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Juergen Hoerer
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 67
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 88
  • Epidemiology 67
  • Surgery 34
  • Internal Medicine 2
Replace Joseph De Giovanni with:
Joseph De Giovanni United Kingdom
Marco Russo Italy
Poonam P. Thankavel United States
Christian Pihl Denmark
José Luiz Barros Pena Brazil
Michael Hainstock United States
Joachim G. Eichhorn Germany
Biana Trost United States
Ilaria Chirichilli Italy
Abdolrahim Ghasemi United States
Juergen Hoerer relative to Joseph De Giovanni United Kingdom Joseph De Giovanni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Joseph De Giovanni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Juergen Hoerer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Juergen Hoerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juergen Hoerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juergen Hoerer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Juergen Hoerer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juergen Hoerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juergen Hoerer. The network helps show where Juergen Hoerer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Juergen Hoerer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Juergen Hoerer Line = papers co-authored together Juergen Hoerer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2012113
2 201322
3 201519
4 20076
5 20036
6 20134
7
ロス手術後の主要な心血管および脳血管有害イベント German-Dutch Ross Registryからの報告
20101
8 20140

About Juergen Hoerer

Juergen Hoerer is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (67 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (88 citations), Epidemiology (67 citations), Surgery (34 citations) and Internal Medicine (2 citations). Juergen Hoerer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Franke, Roland Hetzer, Wolfgang Hemmer, Rüdiger Lange, Armin Gorski, Thorsten Hanke, Ad J.J.C. Bogers, Efstratios I. Charitos, Ulrich Stierle and Ali Dodge‐Khatami. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Circulation, Congenital Heart Disease, International Journal of Cardiology and The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact