Josh Compton

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Josh Compton's Hit Papers

Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19 2020 · 331 citations
3310+2+4Years since publication100200300

Peers

Josh Compton
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Communication 480
  • Literature and Literary Theory 384
  • Health 213
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
  • Applied Psychology 126
Replace Nathan Walter with:
Nathan Walter United States
Thomas Hove South Korea
Sebastian Scherr Germany
Porismita Borah United States
Jonathon McPhetres United States
John A. Banas United States
Amber Hinsley United States
Chia‐chen Yang United States
Edward L. Fink United States
Wonsun Shin Singapore
Josh Compton relative to Nathan Walter United States Nathan Walter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Nathan Walter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Josh Compton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Compton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Compton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Compton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Compton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Compton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Compton. The network helps show where Josh Compton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Josh Compton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Josh Compton Line = papers co-authored together Josh Compton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19
Hit paper breakdown →
2020331
2 2021106
3 200599
4 201691
5 200690
6 200471
7 201270
8 201961
9 200951
10 201150
11 200446
12 200839
13 201238
14 201232
15 200631
16 200528
17 201522
18 201321
19 201320
20 201518

About Josh Compton

Josh Compton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (19 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (16 papers), Media Studies and Communication (9 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (9 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (480 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (384 citations), Health (213 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations) and Applied Psychology (126 citations). Josh Compton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Pfau, Sander van der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek, Bobi Ivanov, Kimberly A. Parker, James A. Dimmock, Ben Jackson, Melisa Basol, John Cook and Jim Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Public Relations Review, Human Communication Research, Communication Theory, Communication & Sport and Annals of the International Communication Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact