Joost Bot

13.0k citations
38 papers · 1.5k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Joost Bot

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Joost Bot
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 931
  • Neurology 517
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 459
  • Rheumatology 294
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 160
Replace M. L. Gawne‐Cain with:
M. L. Gawne‐Cain United Kingdom
Maxim Bester Germany
Hilmar Krapf Germany
Siegrid Strasser‐Fuchs Austria
N. A. Losseff United Kingdom
Giuseppe Iannucci Italy
Kouichirou Okamoto Japan
Siobhan M Leary United Kingdom
Susanne Siemonsen Germany
S. Anand Trip United Kingdom
Joost Bot relative to M. L. Gawne‐Cain United Kingdom M. L. Gawne‐Cain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
M. L. Gawne‐Cain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joost Bot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Bot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Bot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Bot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joost Bot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Bot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Bot. The network helps show where Joost Bot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joost Bot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joost Bot Line = papers co-authored together Joost Bot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004240
2 2001135
3 2002122
4 2002121
5 2004117
6 2002114
7 2001106
8 201973
9 200857
10 200249
11 201048
12 201744
13 200041
14 201835
15 201122
16 200920
17 201019
18 201215
19 202013
20 202112

About Joost Bot

Joost Bot is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (10 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (5 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (5 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers) and Bone and Joint Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (931 citations), Neurology (517 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (459 citations), Rheumatology (294 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (160 citations). Joost Bot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Frederik Barkhof, Chris H. Polman, Jonas A. Castelijns, Elisabeth Bergers, Geert J. Lycklama à Nijeholt, H.J. Adèr, Nynke F. Kalkers, V. de Groot, Wouter Kamphorst and Rivka Ravid. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Radiology, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Frontiers in Neurology and Stroke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact