Jonathan J. Stott

1.5k citations
21 papers · 1.1k · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan J. Stott

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jonathan J. Stott
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.0k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 20
  • Biomedical Engineering 945
  • Biophysics 116
  • Instrumentation 37
Replace J. P. Culver with:
J. P. Culver United States
Andrew M. Siegel United States
Huabei Jiang United States
Mutsuhisa Hiraoka United Kingdom
Troy O. McBride United States
Piotr Sawosz Poland
Subhadra Srinivasan United States
Damon E. Hyde United States
M. A. O’Leary United States
M. H. Koelink Netherlands
Jonathan J. Stott relative to J. P. Culver United States J. P. Culver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
J. P. Culver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan J. Stott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan J. Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan J. Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan J. Stott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan J. Stott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan J. Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan J. Stott. The network helps show where Jonathan J. Stott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan J. Stott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan J. Stott Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan J. Stott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002451
2 2003160
3 2003134
4 2005123
5 2005121
6 200469
7 200334
8 200412
9 199811
10 19974
11 19954
12 19993
13 20173
14 20013
15 20023
16 19952
17 20201
18 20001
19 20021
20 19991

About Jonathan J. Stott

Jonathan J. Stott is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Computer Networks and Communications and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (12 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (9 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (4 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (2 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (20 citations), Biomedical Engineering (945 citations), Biophysics (116 citations) and Instrumentation (37 citations). Jonathan J. Stott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David A. Boas, J. P. Culver, Andrew K. Dunn, Joseph P. Culver, Andrew M. Siegel, Juliette Selb, Richard H. Moore, A. Gregory Sorensen, Ang Li and Thomas J. Brukilacchio. Their work appears in journals such as Liquid Crystals, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Computers in Physics, Optics Express and Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact