Jonathan D. Weiler
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Papers in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 2
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 1
- Russia and Soviet political economy 1
- Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics 1
-
- Social Media and Politics 1
- Journals
- Demokratizatsiya The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization (1 paper)Slavic Review (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jonathan D. Weiler
9 papers receiving 574 citations
Jonathan D. Weiler's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Communication 115
- Political Science and International Relations 380
- Sociology and Political Science 454
- Gender Studies 58
- Social Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan D. Weiler
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan D. Weiler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan D. Weiler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan D. Weiler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan D. Weiler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan D. Weiler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan D. Weiler. The network helps show where Jonathan D. Weiler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan D. Weiler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 525 |
| 2 | 2009 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 7 | Authoritarianism, not social class, is the dividing line between supporting and opposing Donald Trump | 2016 | 2 |
| 8 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 10 | Human Rights in Post-Soviet Russia | 2002 | 0 |
About Jonathan D. Weiler
Jonathan D. Weiler is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Russia and Soviet political economy (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (1 paper) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (380 citations), Sociology and Political Science (454 citations), Gender Studies (58 citations) and Social Psychology (71 citations). Jonathan D. Weiler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc J. Hetherington and Matthew C. MacWilliams. Their work appears in journals such as Demokratizatsiya The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, Slavic Review, Medical Entomology and Zoology, London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.