Jonathan Burnett

543 citations
14 papers · 308 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Burnett

14 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Jonathan Burnett
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Condensed Matter Physics 104
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 250
  • Artificial Intelligence 130
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 60
  • Structural Biology 3
Replace Nataliya Maleeva with:
Nataliya Maleeva Russia
D. P. Pappas United States
J. S. Lehtinen Finland
Alexander Bilmes Germany
J. M. Hornibrook Australia
J. Kunert Germany
Yaniv Rosen United States
R. Dolata Germany
Rhys G. Povey United States
D. Taubert Germany
Jonathan Burnett relative to Nataliya Maleeva Russia Nataliya Maleeva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Nataliya Maleeva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Burnett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Burnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Burnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Burnett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Burnett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Burnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Burnett. The network helps show where Jonathan Burnett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Burnett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Burnett Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Burnett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2014107
2
Analysis of high quality superconducting resonators: consequences for TLS properties in amorphous oxides
201643
3 201927
4 201722
5 202221
6 201121
7 202120
8 202017
9 201317
10 20164
11 20203
12 20163
13 19652
14 20131

About Jonathan Burnett

Jonathan Burnett is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 14 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (6 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (5 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (2 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (2 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (1 paper) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (104 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (250 citations), Artificial Intelligence (130 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (60 citations) and Structural Biology (3 citations). Jonathan Burnett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and France. Frequent co-authors include T. Lindström, Lara Faoro, Alexander Tzalenchuk, J. C. Fenton, P. J. Meeson, P. A. Warburton, В. Л. Гуртовой, R. Shaikhaidarov, V. N. Antonov and Г. М. Михайлов. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physical Review Applied, Nature Communications, Physical Review B and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact