Jon Silkin

471 citations
11 papers · 209 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
  • History top 5%
    • French Historical and Cultural Studies

Papers in

Jon Silkin

9 papers receiving 91 citations

Peers

Jon Silkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
  • History 41
  • Anthropology 34
  • Museology 12
  • Political Science and International Relations 58
Replace M. Kay Flavell with:
M. Kay Flavell United Kingdom
Gerhart Hoffmeister United States
John Colmer Australia
Bruce B. Redford United States
Clive Wake
Katharine M. Rogers United States
R. L. Brett United Kingdom
Eberhard Lämmert Germany
Peter Jelavich United States
Margery Sabin United States
Jon Silkin relative to M. Kay Flavell United Kingdom M. Kay Flavell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
M. Kay Flavell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Silkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Silkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Silkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Silkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Silkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Silkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Silkin. The network helps show where Jon Silkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jon Silkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Silkin Line = papers co-authored together Jon Silkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
The Penguin Book of First World War Poetry
197967
2 195753
3
Out of Battle: The Poetry of the Great War
199853
4 199717
5
The Penguin book of First World War prose
19899
6 19984
7
The two freedoms
19583
8 19711
9 19891
10 19981
11 19970

About Jon Silkin

Jon Silkin is a scholar working on Archeology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Insect Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Archaeology and Historical Studies (1 paper), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (1 paper), Ancient Near East History (1 paper) and Irish and British Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations), History (41 citations), Anthropology (34 citations), Museology (12 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (58 citations). Frequent co-authors include Michael Brownstein, William Dickey, Michael Benedikt, John Cunningham, Vernon R. Young, Robert Bly and Robert G. Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as African Affairs, The Hudson Review, Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact