Jon Kraus

630 citations
38 papers · 327 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Kraus

29 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers

Jon Kraus
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Public Administration 58
  • Development 39
  • Algebra and Number Theory 41
  • Mathematical Physics 60
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36
Replace Jeff Frieden with:
Jeff Frieden United States
Parris H. Chang United States
Baldev Raj Nayar Canada
Kari Polanyi Levitt Canada
Bornwell C. Chikulo South Africa
Jan S. Prybyla United States
Armando Boito Brazil
Emir Sader Brazil
Jacek Kochanowicz Poland
A. H. Hanson
Jon Kraus relative to Jeff Frieden United States Jeff Frieden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Jeff Frieden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Kraus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Kraus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Kraus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Kraus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Kraus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Kraus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Kraus. The network helps show where Jon Kraus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jon Kraus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Kraus Line = papers co-authored together Jon Kraus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199460
2 200246
3 200744
4
The Struggle Over Structural Adjustment in Ghana
199130
5
The Political Economy of Conflict in Ghana
198021
6 200916
7 199114
8 197912
9 198710
10 20078
11 19798
12 19767
13 20075
14 19885
15 20075
16 19694
17
Revolution and the Military in Ghana
19833
18
Rawlings' Second Coming
19823
19
Ghana's New Corporate Parliament
19653
20
A Marxist in Ghana
19672

About Jon Kraus

Jon Kraus is a scholar working on Public Administration, Anthropology, Development, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (7 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (4 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), Global Political and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (58 citations), Development (39 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (41 citations), Mathematical Physics (60 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (36 citations). Jon Kraus has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Uffe Haagerup, Christoph Hilgers, Wouter van der Zee, Ralf Littke and Janos Lajos Urai. Their work appears in journals such as Current History, The Journal of Modern African Studies, African Studies Review, The International Journal of African Historical Studies and Africa Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact