Jon Binnie

2.8k citations
49 papers · 1.9k · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Urban Studies top 0.5%
    • Urban Planning and Governance
    • Night-time city culture
    • Urban and sociocultural dynamics

Papers in

Jon Binnie

46 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jon Binnie
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Gender Studies 1.1k
  • Urban Studies 366
  • Geography, Planning and Development 175
  • Social Psychology 314
  • Sociology and Political Science 732
Replace Anoop Nayak with:
Anoop Nayak United Kingdom
Catherine J. Nash Canada
Natalie Oswin Canada
Allon White
Sophie Bowlby United Kingdom
Karen Nairn New Zealand
Bülent Diken United Kingdom
Philip Kasinitz United States
Mark Liechty United States
Frank Mort United Kingdom
Jon Binnie relative to Anoop Nayak United Kingdom Anoop Nayak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Anoop Nayak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Binnie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Binnie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Binnie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Binnie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Binnie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Binnie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Binnie. The network helps show where Jon Binnie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jon Binnie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Binnie Line = papers co-authored together Jon Binnie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004265
2 2004261
3 1994233
4 2004201
5 1999156
6 1997146
7 2007108
8 199748
9 200443
10 200637
11 200634
12 201333
13 201230
14 201128
15 201128
16 201228
17 201326
18 200525
19 200224
20 200723

About Jon Binnie

Jon Binnie is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Urban Studies, Demography and Social Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender and Feminist Studies (40 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (8 papers), Spatial and Cultural Studies (8 papers), Geography and Education Methods (7 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (6 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (6 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (5 papers) and Urban and sociocultural dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.1k citations), Urban Studies (366 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (175 citations), Social Psychology (314 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (732 citations). Jon Binnie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Bell, Gill Valentine, Beverley Skeggs, Christian Klesse, Julia Cream, Julian Holloway, Steve Millington, Craig Young, Tim Edensor and David Elliott Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Political Geography, The Sociological Review, Gender Place & Culture, Progress in Human Geography and Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact