John W. Standeven

1.2k citations
22 papers · 945 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Standeven

22 papers receiving 895 citations

Peers

John W. Standeven
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental Neuroscience 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 205
  • Emergency Medicine 97
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 209
  • Surgery 382
Replace David C. Reid with:
David C. Reid Canada
Joseph E. Hornyak United States
Sunil Patel United States
Christian Compagnone Italy
David F. Apple United States
Ejnar Eriksson Sweden
Gary J. Farkas United States
Michael Behringer Germany
D. B. Friedman United States
Frank Thömke Germany
John W. Standeven relative to David C. Reid Canada David C. Reid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
David C. Reid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Standeven

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Standeven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Standeven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Standeven more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Standeven

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Standeven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Standeven. The network helps show where John W. Standeven may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Standeven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Standeven Line = papers co-authored together John W. Standeven links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985241
2 2009150
3 2001106
4 2013100
5 197957
6 197749
7 201233
8 197828
9 198428
10 197728
11 198225
12 198119
13 197918
14 199217
15 197610
16 20099
17 19777
18 20015
19 19805
20 19785

About John W. Standeven

John W. Standeven is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 945 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (3 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (68 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (205 citations), Emergency Medicine (97 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (209 citations) and Surgery (382 citations). John W. Standeven has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hendrick B. Barner, Jeffrey C. Reese, Jack R. Engsberg, Max Jellinek, John W. Hahn, Hillel Laks, Mary L. Uhrich, Robert A. Underwood, Nathaniel J. Soper and Vallee L. Willman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Journal of Applied Biomechanics and Spinal Cord.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact