John W. Baum

789 citations
59 papers · 664 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Baum

57 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

John W. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 318
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 37
  • Radiation 75
  • Biophysics 45
  • Cancer Research 76
Replace Arthur H. Cole with:
Arthur H. Cole United States
G. Failla United States
Pascal Pihet France
Soo Hyun Byun Canada
HERMANN J. SCHAEFER United States
B. Caccia Italy
Yu.A. Akatov Russia
Reinhard Meckbach Germany
Rupprecht Maushart Germany
Sara Della Monaca Italy
John W. Baum relative to Arthur H. Cole United States Arthur H. Cole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.3×
Arthur H. Cole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Baum. The network helps show where John W. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Baum Line = papers co-authored together John W. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976100
2 197556
3 197749
4 198046
5 197040
6 197838
7 198025
8 197920
9 197919
10 198316
11 198914
12 198213
13 197312
14
Nanometer dosimetry of heavy ion tracks
197312
15 198511
16 198010
17 198310
18 198410
19 199510
20 199710

About John W. Baum

John W. Baum is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 59 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (23 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (10 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (8 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (8 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (7 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (6 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (318 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (37 citations), Radiation (75 citations), Biophysics (45 citations) and Cancer Research (76 citations). John W. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Varma, P.G. Kale, Victor Potter Bond, J. Lyman, Harold H. Smith, R. H. Thomas, Adam B. Smith, Charles H. Nauman, R. V. Griffith and Jennifer E. Hewitt. Their work appears in journals such as Health Physics, Radiation Research, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene and Bioelectromagnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact