John R. Spence

10.8k citations
256 papers · 8.5k · h-index 47

Impact in

Papers in

John R. Spence

246 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

John R. Spence
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Insect Science 4.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.1k
  • Ecological Modeling 756
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.1k
  • Ecology 3.9k
Replace Roland Brandl with:
Roland Brandl Germany
Bruno Baur Switzerland
Pekka Niemelä Finland
Martin M. Goßner Germany
I. D. Hodkinson United Kingdom
Lloyd L. Loope United States
R. L. Kitching Australia
Mark Maraun Germany
Michael Kaspari United States
Javier Retana Spain
John R. Spence relative to Roland Brandl Germany Roland Brandl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roland Brandl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Spence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Spence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Spence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Spence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Spence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Spence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Spence. The network helps show where John R. Spence may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Spence, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John R. Spence Line = papers co-authored together John R. Spence links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 256 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994422
2 1993335
3 1993293
4 1995247
5 2002225
6 2005193
7 2000185
8
Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species
1996178
9 1990177
10 2000159
11 1992136
12 1994132
13 2002129
14 2001115
15 2004114
16 2004114
17 1991108
18 2004106
19 1995103
20 200798

About John R. Spence

John R. Spence is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 256 papers that have together received 8.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (82 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (66 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (52 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (41 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (38 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (36 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (35 papers) and Plant and animal studies (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (4.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (756 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.1k citations) and Ecology (3.9k citations). John R. Spence has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include David W. Langor, Jari Niemelä, Héctor A. Cárcamo, Christopher M. Buddle, R. E. Longton, W. Jan A. Volney, Cameron R. Currie, Timothy T. Work, Jaime Pinzón and Scott C. Digweed. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Canadian Journal of Zoology, Environmental Entomology, Ecography and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact