John Miles
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Neurology top 10%
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Papers in
- Surgery 9
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 3
-
- Pain Management and Treatment 4
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 3
- Co-authors
- Susan J. Benbow (1 shared paper)I. A. MacFarlane (1 shared paper)Solomon Tesfaye (1 shared paper)Sampson Lipton (4 shared papers)Paul Eldridge (1 shared paper)Massimo Leandri (1 shared paper)David Bowsher (2 shared papers)Frances Chung (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pain (3 papers)The Lancet (3 papers)Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (2 papers)Neurosurgery (2 papers)Journal of Physical Oceanography (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesUruguay
In The Last Decade
John Miles
31 papers receiving 561 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 209
- Neurology 114
- Physiology 179
- Neurology 47
- Pharmacology 93
Countries citing papers authored by John Miles
This map shows the geographic impact of John Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Miles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Miles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Miles. The network helps show where John Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside John Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 206 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1970 | 19 | |
| 11 | Richardson's Number Revisited | 1990 | 11 |
| 12 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 4 |
About John Miles
John Miles is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Treatment (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (4 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (209 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Physiology (179 citations), Neurology (47 citations) and Pharmacology (93 citations). John Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Uruguay. Frequent co-authors include Susan J. Benbow, I. A. MacFarlane, Solomon Tesfaye, Sampson Lipton, Paul Eldridge, Massimo Leandri, David Bowsher, Frances Chung, Matthew Makin and Chris Wells. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, The Lancet, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery and Journal of Physical Oceanography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.