John Miles
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Neurology top 10%
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Papers in
- Surgery 10
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 3
-
- Pain Management and Treatment 4
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 3
- Co-authors
- I. A. MacFarlane (1 shared paper)Solomon Tesfaye (1 shared paper)Susan J. Benbow (1 shared paper)Sampson Lipton (4 shared papers)Paul Eldridge (1 shared paper)Massimo Leandri (1 shared paper)David Bowsher (2 shared papers)Frances Chung (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pain (3 papers)The Lancet (3 papers)Journal of Physical Oceanography (2 papers)Neurosurgery (2 papers)Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesUruguay
In The Last Decade
John Miles
32 papers receiving 558 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 221
- Neurology 162
- Physiology 242
- Pharmacology 150
- Neurology 71
Countries citing papers authored by John Miles
This map shows the geographic impact of John Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Miles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Miles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Miles. The network helps show where John Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside John Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 204 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1970 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 12 | Richardson's Number Revisited | 1990 | 11 |
| 13 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 4 |
About John Miles
John Miles is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (4 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (4 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (221 citations), Neurology (162 citations), Physiology (242 citations), Pharmacology (150 citations) and Neurology (71 citations). John Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Uruguay. Frequent co-authors include I. A. MacFarlane, Solomon Tesfaye, Susan J. Benbow, Sampson Lipton, Paul Eldridge, Massimo Leandri, David Bowsher, Frances Chung, Matthew Makin and G Hampf. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, The Lancet, Journal of Physical Oceanography, Neurosurgery and Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.