John Mayne

65 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John Mayne
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Public Administration 347
  • Management Science and Operations Research 759
  • Information Systems and Management 127
  • General Health Professions 366
  • Applied Psychology 69
Replace Patricia Rogers with:
Patricia Rogers Australia
Frans L. Leeuw Netherlands
Isabel Walter United Kingdom
Harry P. Hatry United States
Eleanor Chelimsky United States
Christina A. Christie United States
Michael Bamberger United States
Steve Jacob Canada
Fred Carden Canada
Evert Vedung Sweden
John Mayne relative to Patricia Rogers Australia Patricia Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Patricia Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mayne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mayne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mayne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mayne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mayne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mayne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mayne. The network helps show where John Mayne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mayne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mayne Line = papers co-authored together John Mayne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001239
2 2012219
3 2015139
4 2008100
5 200790
6 201782
7 201477
8 201564
9
DFID Working Paper 38. Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations.
201251
10 201546
11 201744
12 201738
13 200437
14 200933
15 200331
16 200430
17 200726
18 201926
19 201925
20 201422

About John Mayne

John Mayne is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (43 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (12 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (5 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers) and Public Policy and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (347 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (759 citations), Information Systems and Management (127 citations), General Health Professions (366 citations) and Applied Psychology (69 citations). John Mayne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Befani, Nancy L. Johnson, Robert Schwartz, Ray C. Rist, Boru Douthwaite, Cynthia McDougall, Elliot Stern, Nicoletta Stame, Joe Hudson and Frans L. Leeuw. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning, IDS Bulletin and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact