John Ma

6 papers and 15 indexed citations
i
.

About

John Ma is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology and Classics. According to data from OpenAlex, John Ma has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 15 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Anthropology, 5 papers in Archeology and 2 papers in Classics. Recurrent topics in John Ma’s work include Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Ancient Near East History (3 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). John Ma is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Ancient Near East History (3 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). John Ma collaborates with scholars based in United States. John Ma's co-authors include and and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Archaeology, The Journal of Hellenic Studies and Art History.

In The Last Decade

No nodes

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ma. The network helps show where John Ma may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by John Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ma more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026